On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:13:52PM +0100, Uli Luckas wrote: > On Friday, 13. February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > The daemon holds the lock in the first place. > When did the daemon take the lock? When it anticipated the process would > crash? When it was first asked to. In this model invidual applications wouldn't take locks themselves - it would be up to the daemon to handle the kernel interaction. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm