On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:46:42PM +0100, Uli Luckas wrote: > That's racy. By the time the daemon notices that a process crashed, the kernel > might already have triggered suspend. userspace might then be frozen before > it can accuire the 'process restarting' lock. > I also wonder, if it is immanently racy to use userspcae communication > (client/daemon) for suspend locks. What if the daemon is already frozen when > a client sends a lock request request? The daemon holds the lock in the first place. There's no race. As for issues with the freezer, I think my position on that is fairly well known... -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
