On Wednesday, 11. February 2009, Brian Swetland wrote: > [Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>] > > > > wake_lock never blocks. > > > > Wakelock is really bad name: it is not a lock and it does not protect > > wake. I'd say we need better name here. > > I agree with you here -- I've had this discussion with Arve previously, > but have been unable to offer a compelling alternative name. Anybody > have a good idea? > > Some people use "sleep vote" for a similar mechanism (though usually > you're voting against sleep, which makes it feel backwards to me). > Which makes it a veto. -- ------- ROAD ...the handyPC Company - - - ) ) ) Uli Luckas Head of Software Development ROAD GmbH Bennigsenstr. 14 | 12159 Berlin | Germany fon: +49 (30) 230069 - 62 | fax: +49 (30) 230069 - 69 url: www.road.de Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 96688 B Managing director: Hans-Peter Constien _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
