[Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>] > > > > wake_lock never blocks. > > Wakelock is really bad name: it is not a lock and it does not protect > wake. I'd say we need better name here. I agree with you here -- I've had this discussion with Arve previously, but have been unable to offer a compelling alternative name. Anybody have a good idea? Some people use "sleep vote" for a similar mechanism (though usually you're voting against sleep, which makes it feel backwards to me). Brian _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
