On Monday 02 February 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi again. > > On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 22:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > The warning in pci_legacy_suspend() would be much more useful if it > > printed the name of the function that did the wrong thing. Make it > > do so. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > > @@ -365,7 +365,9 @@ static int pci_legacy_suspend(struct dev > > if (pci_dev->state_saved) > > goto Fixup; > > > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pci_dev->current_state != PCI_D0)) > > + if (WARN_ONCE(pci_dev->current_state != PCI_D0, > > + "PCI PM: Device state not saved by %pF\n", > > + drv->suspend)) > > goto Fixup; > > } > > Am I right in thinking that WARN_ONCE will only warn about the first > driver that has the problem? If so, wouldn't it be better to make it > warn about all drivers that have the problem, but only once per device? That would be better, but I don't think we are going to see many of these anyway. :-) Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
