Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI PM: Make warning in pci_legacy_suspend more useful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi again.

On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 22:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The warning in pci_legacy_suspend() would be much more useful if it
> printed the name of the function that did the wrong thing.  Make it
> do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,9 @@ static int pci_legacy_suspend(struct dev
>  		if (pci_dev->state_saved)
>  			goto Fixup;
>  
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pci_dev->current_state != PCI_D0))
> +		if (WARN_ONCE(pci_dev->current_state != PCI_D0,
> +				"PCI PM: Device state not saved by %pF\n",
> +				drv->suspend))
>  			goto Fixup;
>  	}

Am I right in thinking that WARN_ONCE will only warn about the first
driver that has the problem? If so, wouldn't it be better to make it
warn about all drivers that have the problem, but only once per device?

Regards,

Nigel

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux