Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Android PM extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 31 January 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Brian Swetland wrote:
> >> Imagine the computer in question is a cellphone which is going to need
> >> to wake up when a call comes in to do traditional cellphone things, like
> >> ring, bring up the incall UI (so the user can answer/cancel), etc.
> >
> > Yes.  So what?  Nothing I said prevents the computer from waking up
> > when a call comes in.  What I said was that when the user tells the
> > computer to suspend (e.g., by writing "mem" to /sys/power/state), the
> > computer should suspend even if some wakelocks are still locked.
> 
> But this could prevent the phone from ringing. What if the user-space
> code that is responsible for playing the ringtone has been notified
> that a call is coming in and starts reading the audio file with the
> ringtone. At the same, the user, unaware that someone is calling,
> presses the power button. If we ignore the wakelock in this situation,
> the phone will not ring.

What if the user decides to power off the phone and a call comes in at the
same time?

Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux