* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again > > My previous patch to make CONFIG_NUMA on x86_32 depend on BROKEN > turned out to be unnecessary, after all, since the source of the > hibernation vs CONFIG_NUMA problem turned out to be the fact that > we didn't take the NUMA KVA remapping into account in the > hibernation code. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) applied to tip/x86/numa, thanks Rafael! Ingo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
