From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again My previous patch to make CONFIG_NUMA on x86_32 depend on BROKEN turned out to be unnecessary, after all, since the source of the hibernation vs CONFIG_NUMA problem turned out to be the fact that we didn't take the NUMA KVA remapping into account in the hibernation code. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT config NUMA bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)" depends on SMP + depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL) - depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && BROKEN) default n if X86_PC default y if (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP) help _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
