Re: [PATCH] PM: use pm_op methods for device types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Okay, I was confused too.  Looking more closely, it's apparent that 
> > mainline is okay and the problem was introduced by Hannes Reinecke's 
> > 
> > driver-core-remove-suspend-resume-callbacks-for-device-type.patch
> > 
> > which states that the suspend/resume callbacks in struct device_type
> > are unused.  It may be true that the legacy suspend/resume methods are
> > unused, but the new pm_ops methods definitely are used.
> > 
> > Therefore part or all of Hannes patch should be reverted.  And the 
> > mainline is okay as it stands.
> 
> Ah, ick.
> 
> Hannes, care to respin this patch based on this information?

I guess Hannes patch shoud simply be dropped....

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux