On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:27:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 25 of September 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > > This patch (as1141) adds code to use the device type's pm_op methods, > > if they are defined. It fixes a regression in the USB PM code; the > > various suspend and resume methods are defined in the device type > > rather than in the bus, because USB devices have to be handled > > differently from USB interfaces. Without the patch, those methods > > never get called. > > > > The patch also fixes a couple of spelling errors. > > Hm, these changes are not needed in the current mainline, so there's a patch > in -next that removes the code added by this patch. > > It might be better to find that patch and drop it instead, IMO. I agree, I think we would have seen more bugs if mainline can't suspend with a USB device attached, right? confused, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
