Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] kexec jump -v12: save/restore device state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Vivek,

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 09:48 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[...]
> You have cited various possible use cases of this patchset. Which is
> the specific feature you are planning to use?

I think two features are useful:

1. Kexec based hibernation
2. Do kdump then continue

> Thinking more about it, what's the compelling feature out of this list
> which makes this patchset a strong candidate for inclusion?
> 
> Regarding hibernation, Rafael does not think this is the way to go 
> for future.

I think kexec based hibernation can be a better hibernation scheme, at
least more code sharing.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux