On Monday, 14 of July 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:45 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi Jesse, > > > > The recently introduced pci_prepare_to_sleep() needs the following fix, > > because there are systems which are not power manageable by ACPI (ie. ACPI > > doesn't provide methods to put the device into low power states and back), > > but require ACPI hooks to be executed for wake-up to work. > > > > Please apply. > > > > Thanks, > > Rafael > > > > --- > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > Fix pci_prepare_to_sleep() to work on systems that are not power > > manageable by ACPI (ie. ACPI doesn't provide methods to put the > > device into low power states and back into the full power state), but > > require ACPI hooks to be executed for wake-up to work. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Based on what you've told me so far about the number of ACPI vs. native wakeup > methods & problems, I'm starting to get a little worried that making this > stuff work right will require lots of platform specific quirks. Yes, this is likely. Also, having looked at several network adapters' suspend and resume routines, I think we'll need to do some fine tuning here and there. > I guess that's just par for the course though, and this patch looks fine, so > I just applied it to my linux-next branch. Thanks! Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
