On Thursday 29 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Could you check, please? The previous version didn't.
> >
>
> There's just one trivial reject against the PCI tree's
> pm-introduce-new-top-level-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks:
Thanks Andrew ... in that case I'm not going to worry
about any "-next" issues for now.
- Dave
> ***************
> *** 293,299 ****
> if (suspend_ops->finish)
> suspend_ops->finish();
> Resume_devices:
> device_resume();
> Resume_console:
> resume_console();
> Close:
> --- 342,350 ----
> if (suspend_ops->finish)
> suspend_ops->finish();
> Resume_devices:
> + suspend_test_start();
> device_resume();
> + suspend_test_finish("resume devices");
> Resume_console:
> resume_console();
> Close:
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
