On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:29:48 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 of May 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Two questions:
> > >
> > > 1) How is it related to the analogous patch in the Ingo's tree?
> >
> > AFAIK -- just that it's an updated version. Comments, some
> > code flow, but mostly having the "test_suspend=mode" parameter
> > default to "safe -- no testing" and allows the choice of modes.
> >
> >
> > > 2) Does it apply to the current linux-next?
> >
> > No idea.
>
> Could you check, please? The previous version didn't.
>
There's just one trivial reject against the PCI tree's
pm-introduce-new-top-level-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks:
***************
*** 293,299 ****
if (suspend_ops->finish)
suspend_ops->finish();
Resume_devices:
device_resume();
Resume_console:
resume_console();
Close:
--- 342,350 ----
if (suspend_ops->finish)
suspend_ops->finish();
Resume_devices:
+ suspend_test_start();
device_resume();
+ suspend_test_finish("resume devices");
Resume_console:
resume_console();
Close:
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
