Re: sleepy linux self-test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >  [   23.893598] Calling initcall 0xc0c518b0: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
> >  [   23.901601] PM: no wakelarm-capable RTC
> >  [   23.905599] initcall 0xc0c518b0: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170() returned 0.
> >  [   23.910879] initcall 0xc0c518b0 ran for 3 msecs: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
> > 
> > so close, yet so far away :-)
> 
> good news: the suspend+resume self-test works perfectly now! :-)

Good. What's next here? Will you just merge it to -x86, meaning it is
planned for 2.6.26?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux