On Monday, 4 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > BTW, I don't like the way in which the 'struct wakeup_header' fields are > > reproduced in rm/wakeup.S very much, because it makes the code fragile. > > It might be better to define the offsets in asm-offsets*.c and refer to them > > relative to wakeup_header (if possible). > > If you can do that.. yes, that would be nice. I triple-checked it, but > indeed is fragile. Do you want me to remove the unused fields from 'struct wakeup_header' too? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
