Hi! > > The changes look good to me. > > They feel unfinished to me though. :) > > Like using "jiffies" instead of a clocksource, which makes trouble > since the timing covers periods with IRQs disabled. And the test > mode parameter needs work. Well, I'd say that timing has bigger problem, right? It is set alarm suspend system | poweroff alarm expires system resumes ... so you are measuring resume time + sleep time, no? > > Well, it would be nice to have this feature in as soon as reasonably possible, > > so that people can include suspend tests in the automated testing. > > Except ... "rtcwake" (from util-linux-ng) already supports such > testing, albeit from userspace. But not the timing tests. > > What was the rationale for wanting this done in-kernel? (Other > than to know it can work portably.) Ingo has to answer this one... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
