> > See the appended; it includes more of Ingo's suggestions. > > > > Since this is increasingly unrelated to the "sleepy linux" concept > > (a version of what systems like OLPC, N700, and N800 are doing), I > > got rid of the "sleepy.c" file. > > The changes look good to me. They feel unfinished to me though. :) Like using "jiffies" instead of a clocksource, which makes trouble since the timing covers periods with IRQs disabled. And the test mode parameter needs work. > Well, it would be nice to have this feature in as soon as reasonably possible, > so that people can include suspend tests in the automated testing. Except ... "rtcwake" (from util-linux-ng) already supports such testing, albeit from userspace. But not the timing tests. What was the rationale for wanting this done in-kernel? (Other than to know it can work portably.) - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
