Hi Ted. Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to >>> one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that >>> due to the much lower traffic. >> I guess that makes sense. I guess people can always be referred to LKML >> for the issues where the appropriate person isn't on linux-pm. > > Hi Nigel, > > I'd really recommend pushing the TuxOnIce discussions to LKML. That > way people can see the size of the user community and Andrew and Linus > can see how many people are using TuxOnIce. They can also see how > well the TuxOnIce community helps address user problems, which is a > big consideration when Linus decides whether or not to merge a > particular technology. > > If the goal is eventual merger of TuxOnIce, LKML is really the best > place to have the discussions. Examples such as Realtime, CFS, and > others have shown that you really want to keep the discussion front > and center. When one developer says, "not my problem; my code is > perfect", and the other developer is working with users who report > problems, guess which technology generally ends up getting merged by > Linus? Yes. The goal is eventual merger. That's what I was thinking too. Thanks for the input! Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
