On Tuesday, 1 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. Hi Nigel, > With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about > what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get. > > First up, I'm thinking about closing the mailing lists and asking people > to use LKML instead for reporting issues and so on. I'm thinking about > this because it will help with allowing people who work on mainline to > see how stable (or otherwise!) TuxOnIce is now. It should also help when > (as often happens) bug reports aren't actually issues with the patch, > but with vanilla (ie drivers). I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that due to the much lower traffic. > Perhaps it will also help with whatever effort I find time to make towards > convincing Andrew that it really does have significant advantages over > [u]swsusp and kexec based hibernation. > > Secondly, I'm planning on moving the website soonish. It's taken longer > than I planned because it will be sharing with another server I'm > maintaining, and it has taken longer than expected to find good hosting > for the other server (which was done first). Now that I'm happy with the > other server's state, I'm hoping to start shifting > suspend2.net/tuxonice.net soon. > > For those who might be looking for hosting themselves, I'm using > slicehost. I initially tried GoDaddy, but had terrible service, problems > with draconian limits on the volume of outgoing email (1000/day by > default - useless if you're doing mailing lists) and unexpected, > unexplained delays in mail delivery through the SMTP delay they force > you to use. Slicehost, on the other hand, are terrific to deal with in > everyway. If you sign up with them because of this email, please > consider putting my email (nigel at suspend2.net) as the referrer - I > then get a discount on the cost of the hosting. > > Third, regarding the patch itself, I'm taking my time in working towards > the 3.0 release. We don't have any major bugs with 3.0-rc3 reported, but > I have some things I want to complete before the final release: > * see it well tested; > * get a finished initial version of the cluster support; > * finish completing support for the new resume-from-other kernels > functionality that Rafael has added in 2.6.24. (We can resume from the > same kernel at the moment, but I need to convince myself that nosave > data is properly handled). Have you finished the support for freezing filesystems before freezing tasks that we talked about some time ago? Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
