Hi, On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 14:54 +0100, ext Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:26:04AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > cpufreq_set_policy() doesn't match Nokia's needs as it is a 1-way > > notification, and there is no way to register constraints. > > Could you elaborate a bit on this? cpufreq_update_policy() and > cpufreq_register_notifier() allows to register constraints, and then you can > use cpufreq_update_policy(). we are using update policy, but the problem with the notifications as cpufreq handles them, is that we wanted to have a specific sequence of operations been done, while (if i'm not wrong) the cpufreq notifications do not provide this feature. Probably this is not really needed for traditional x86 systems, while SoC allow to know at design time what sort of devices will be present in the system. -- Cheers, Igor Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxx> (Nokia Multimedia - CP - OSSO / Helsinki, Finland) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
