On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:25:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value); > > +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value); > > +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name); > > It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are > many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel. > > s/qos/pm_qos/g ? lat_qos or something might be more suitable.. it's a latency property, not a power management one (even if pm ends up being the primary user of it). _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
