Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +#define QOS_RESERVED 0
> +#define QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY 2
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT 3
> +
> +#define QOS_NUM_CLASSES 4
> +#define QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
> +
> +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value);
> +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value);
> +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name);

It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are
many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel.

s/qos/pm_qos/g ?
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux