Re: [RFC] Replacing sysdevs with platform devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>     Now, on the s3c24xx platforms one sysdev seems to be used for many
>     platform-related operations.  In particular, two or more different sysdev
>     drivers having .suspend() and/or .resume() callbacks defined, related to
>     different parts of the platform, seem to bind to the same sysdev, which is
>     kind of ugly.  It seems to be more correct to have a separate platform
>     device defined for each thing that requires to be suspended late or resumed
>     early and a dedicated platform driver handling these operations.

A suggestion.  The information's all there.  All it takes is to look it
up.

ARM/S3C2410 ARM ARCHITECTURE
P:      Ben Dooks
M:      ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx
L:      linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (subscribers-only)
W:      http://www.fluff.org/ben/linux/
S:      Maintained

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux