Re: [PATH 0/1] Kexec jump - v2 - the first step to kexec based hibernation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 19 July 2007 08:43, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I like the idea but I think I'll let people chat about it a bit more
> > before looking at merging the patches, OK?
> 
> I think maybe we should wait for Rafael to separate the device hibernate
> (quiesce and state save) from device suspend.

Well, I'm afraid that will take some time ...

> Without that, the ACPI issue can not be resolved.

Yes, it seems so.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux