Hi!
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/process.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/process.c
> > > @@ -237,20 +237,23 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez
> > > */
> > > int freeze_processes(void)
> > > {
> > > - int error;
> > > + int error = 0;
> >
> > You set error unconditionally few lines below.
>
> Ah, thanks. There were a couple of versions of this patch and I forgot to
> remove this.
>
> > > - printk("Stopping tasks ... ");
> > > + printk("Freezing user space processes ... ");
> > > error = try_to_freeze_tasks(FREEZER_USER_SPACE);
> > > if (error)
> > > - return error;
> > > + goto Exit;
> > > + printk("done.\n");
> > >
> > > + printk("Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... ");
> >
> > can we ust do printk(" rest ... "); ? Saves one line... and suspend
> > process is too verbose anyway.
>
> In fact, this is related to the next patch, in which try_to_freeze_tasks() is
> reworked and without this it won't be clear which phase of the freezing has
> failed (in case of failure, that is).
Ok, ACK , then.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
