Hi! > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Increase the freezer's verbosity a bit, so that it's easier to read problem > reports related to it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/power/process.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/process.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/process.c > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/process.c > @@ -237,20 +237,23 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez > */ > int freeze_processes(void) > { > - int error; > + int error = 0; You set error unconditionally few lines below. > - printk("Stopping tasks ... "); > + printk("Freezing user space processes ... "); > error = try_to_freeze_tasks(FREEZER_USER_SPACE); > if (error) > - return error; > + goto Exit; > + printk("done.\n"); > > + printk("Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... "); can we ust do printk(" rest ... "); ? Saves one line... and suspend process is too verbose anyway. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm