On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 23:36, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:37:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 23:20, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > We're used to the idea of applications blocking when a resource they're > > > using goes away - NFS has done it forever. > > > > Now, please tell me how many driver writers even thought that something > > might try to access their devices after .suspend() had been executed (or > > even whilie it was being executed)? > > Every single driver that fails under those conditions is already broken, > and has been forever. It's likely that they're broken under run-time > suspend, too. Well, I won't argue with that, but do you actually know how many drivers are broken this way? Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
