On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:10:08PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > No, no -- you have it exactly backwards. Removing the freezer turns > STR into something _less_ like runtime suspend, because it adds the > requirement that devices must not automatically be resumed when an I/O > request arrives. But that's fine - "Are we undergoing a systemwide suspend" is an easy question to ask. Freezing processes instead means that most of those paths will never be tested. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
