On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:32 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > I'm not sure why this can't be made atomic, but assuming, that it > > can't, fuse should still not need to be implicated. If it is, > that's > > an indication about something wrong in the suspend procedure. > > Nope, something's wrong in fuse. You must be able to deal with sync > until every task is frozen. Pipe dream Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
