Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Miklos Szeredi: > > And a further question. The freezer is not atomic. What do you do > > if a task not yet frozen calls sys_sync(), but fuse is already frozen? > > What do you do if a task not yet frozen writes to a pipe, on the other > end of which is a task already frozen? The same as you do with a pipe when the reader is not ready. > It doesn't matter. The only thing that should matter during suspend > (not hibernate) is saving the state of devices to ram, and putting the > devices to sleep. Well, but you did remove sys_sync() from the freezer, which is and must be called in the hibernate path. > I'm not sure why this can't be made atomic, but assuming, that it > can't, fuse should still not need to be implicated. If it is, that's > an indication about something wrong in the suspend procedure. Nope, something's wrong in fuse. You must be able to deal with sync until every task is frozen. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
