Hi! > We give the user a chance to decide how this tradeoff should go when > entering hibernation. Why not also give the user a chance to decide the > tradeoff during normal shutdown? > > Yes, it violates the spec in the sense that we would be entering S4 > without saving a memory image. I think you already replied to yourself :-). There are more reasons, like we getting useless code paths to debug. So far you demonstrated that S4-on-shutdown is probably possible, and while violating specs, it should probably work. What do you expect now? Me jumping with joy and implementing S4-on-shutdown because it should be possible? Now... if you feel very strongly about S4-on-shutdown, you may try to create a patch. If it is not-too-ugly, and if it is really good for something, we may merge it. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
