On Monday, 7 May 2007 03:16, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 05 May 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Agreed, these all sound like problems in the ACPI driver's implementation > > of suspend and resume. Problems that are caused (at least in part) by the > > fact that the PM core doesn't tell the driver whether it's doing > > suspend-to-RAM vs. hibernation. Once that is straighened out, everything > > else should become much simpler. > > I'm not sure I agree with that diagnosis, but for the record: > updating drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c so that it can implement the > platform_pci_choose_state() hook requires ACPI to export that > information. > > So for now I have drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c exporting > > s_state = acpi_get_target_sleep_state(); > > so that ACPI-aware code can know to call "_S3D" instead of > the "_S1D" or "_S4D" methods (and "_S3W" etc). Of course > the $SUBJECT patch will finish borking that for S4. :( Why exactly? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
