Re: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: do not use pm_ops (was: Re: suspend2 merge (was: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 20:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> I think we may need yet another callback, executed before pre_snapshot()
> and before we shrink memory during the hibernation, to be used by drivers
> that need a lot of additional memory in pre_snapshot().

I'm not sure we really need a callback here for that, your suspend
memory allocation chain seemed good enough since most drivers won't
actually be using it and it's not a hard requirement. Not that I care
much.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux