On Friday, 4 May 2007 23:54, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 23:55 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 4 May 2007 23:23, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 23:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > Actually, prethaw is to prevent drivers loaded before the image is restored > > > > from doing unreasonable things. It doesn't have any effect on the drivers' > > > > .resume() routines. > > > > > > Oh, but it can, you could have a flag in your driver saying "the next > > > resume is after restore" and you set that flag in prethaw. > > > > No, you should have set that flag in .suspend(), really. :-) > > Yeah, whatever. You can fix the problem but it's ugly. Let's come up > with a good way to do the 6 callbacks mentioned in some other thread > earlier. This is the plan, but we need to do some preparations. For example, I think, we should introduce some consistent terminology, so that we *always* know what we're talking about. Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
