Hi. On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 00:12 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > NAK. This slows down regular operation, at it is 30 lines for what > > > should have been one (or five). > > > > Count them. It is one line (an if statement) plus seven lines of > > comment. > > You count them. Hint... you'll need to read original patch. Ah. You're assuming this is the only use of freezer_is_on(). > > > Just place avenrun[0] = avenrun[1] = avenrun[2] = 0 at strategic place > > > if you feel strongly about this. Additional points for using Rafael's > > > "suspend done" notifier so that you don't have to modify suspend core. > > > > =0 might not be right. If you did have a high load average prior to > > suspending, not delivering email would be the right thing to do. > > Ok, so =0 is not right, but it is better than adding 30lines of junk > to the kernel. > > NAK on this patch. Original behaviour is acceptable. to someone who IIRC correctly recently said he doesn't even use the code. Nigel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
