On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:47 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, I didn't like them, because they should refer to the local CPU only (the > other ones are supposed to be disabled at that point). Also, since we are > going to do some things apart from disabling the (local) IRQs in there, I > thought some other names would be better. True. > Still, if that's confusing, I'm not > going to fight either. :-) Well it seemed to me that Dmitry's question might have been due to a slight confusion here. Then again, the docs are there and clearly describe what to do... I've clarified the description again and will resend in a minute. Do we want the patch that munges pm_ops when registering or the one that modifies all current users? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
