On Friday, 13 April 2007 11:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > The docs in the patch I posted should make it clear enough, but if > > somebody can come up with a better name for "activate" I'm all ears. > > I personally quite like your original irq_off/irq_on :-) > > But I won't put up a fight for it if others disagree.. Well, I didn't like them, because they should refer to the local CPU only (the other ones are supposed to be disabled at that point). Also, since we are going to do some things apart from disabling the (local) IRQs in there, I thought some other names would be better. Still, if that's confusing, I'm not going to fight either. :-) Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
