On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, the change itself wouldn't be big (three #defines or so), but it would > break all of the existing setups. > > Alternatively, we can add some ioctls that duplicate those with nonportable > numbers and tell people to use the new ones in the future (documentation > changes would be needed). Sounds like a plan then, no? Make them print a big warning that people actually see and put the other numbers on the feature deprecation schedule :) I do have a 64-bit powerpc that runs 32-bit userspace exclusively, that's why I asked. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
