Re: 32-bit user suspend program on 64-bit kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Unfortunately the numbers of ioctls are not portable due to my rookie mistake
> in the beginning (using void * in _IOW() and friends which passed with no
> objections).
> 
> I'm ashamed of that, but it's probably too late to fix it. :-(

Bugger. What would be required to fix it?

Thing is, this is going to make powerpc distro's lives difficult since
part of uswsusp needs to live in the initrd which usually just contains
kernel modules + normal programs, and no powerpc distro I know of ships
64-bit userspace on a 32-bit kernel since, well, it doesn't really have
many advantages.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux