Re: Alternative Concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 19 March 2007 7:12 am, Scott E. Preece wrote:
> 
> Could you guys present a clear definition of exactly what you mean by
> "clock domain" and "power domain"? I can think of several different ways
> to interpret the phrases, and I'd like to end up with the same meaning
> that you are arguing from...

A set of devices that use the same power supply or clock are
in the same "power domain" or "clock domain" (respectively).

The domains will often be hierarchical, e.g. a base clock
rooting other clocks, derived from it by dividers, PLL,
or clock gates.

Sometimes domains overlap ... e.g. a controller that needs
to use one logic level for on-chip logic and another for the
external interface; or similarly, different clock rates.

Simple chips may not have many domains.  Nowadays I think
most SOCs have at least a decent selection of clock domains,
to eliminate the power drain involved in driving transistors
through clock ticks.  I understand it's more complicated to
have multiple power domains, but the incentive to shrink the
leakage current is strong.  (So adding on-chip power domains
involves tricks to constrain leakage, and not just an ability
to operate without a given power rail.)

I think that captures the basics... from a software perspective.
I'm sure a hardware guy could provide a more advanced course.

- Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux