Re: Alternative Concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/15/07, Ikhwan Lee <dlrghks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/15/07, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > So you think that platforms which don't have such interdependencies
> > should incur costs and complexity to address problems they don't have.
> > Why?
>
> Not every platform implements the clock interface. I think same can be
> done with the proposed power parameter framework. The basic codes
> defining the power parameter interface need not be costly and complex.

Exactly! Maybe once we get to the stage of interface discussion, Matt
and Eugeny could provide a roadmap on the evolution of the PM
framework. Personally, I don't see clock framework disappearing
overnight for platforms that do use it.

/Amit
--
Amit Kucheria, Nokia
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux