On 3/15/07, Ikhwan Lee <dlrghks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/15/07, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So you think that platforms which don't have such interdependencies > > should incur costs and complexity to address problems they don't have. > > Why? > > Not every platform implements the clock interface. I think same can be > done with the proposed power parameter framework. The basic codes > defining the power parameter interface need not be costly and complex. Exactly! Maybe once we get to the stage of interface discussion, Matt and Eugeny could provide a roadmap on the evolution of the PM framework. Personally, I don't see clock framework disappearing overnight for platforms that do use it. /Amit -- Amit Kucheria, Nokia _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm