Re: [6/6] 2.6.21-rc3: known regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> 
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
> 
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
> Subject    : Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/271
> Submitter  : Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
> Status     : unknown

That's not a regression. That's an informal message, when the TSC
watchdog detects that the TSC is unreliable. 

	tglx


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux