On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > I believe this power parameter framework should solve many (if not > > all) of the issues raised by using operating points as the base > > abstraction and provide a common layer across architectures. Eugeny > > and I have the beginnings of an API proposal for this framework, but > > we wanted to get some high level feedback on the concepts so we can > > adjust the API if necessary. So, comments? > > Looks better than powerop certainly. > > Perhaps first step would be to convert cpufreq to this new framework? The first step is to get a parameter framework in upstream. It will take some time for the applications of this proposed framework to materialize and drive the maturing of the implementation. These won't get written unless a framework is upstream. I don't know if having cpufreq plug into this framework will ever make a lot of sense. However; it would be simple to create a cpufreq driver that access the parameter layer for some selected platforms. (N800?) --mgross _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
