On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> When the windfarm thread gets a suspend signal it will die instead of
> freezing. This fixes it.
Don't we still need to call try_to_freeze() ?
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net>
>
> ---
> Adresses Christoph's comment: This keeps the original try_to_freeze() in
> place and just remove the code that kills the thread on a signal.
>
> --- mb-wireless.orig/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_core.c 2007-02-05 16:07:10.524524763 +0100
> +++ mb-wireless/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_core.c 2007-02-05 23:49:46.004524763 +0100
> @@ -117,12 +117,6 @@ static int wf_thread_func(void *data)
> delay = next - jiffies;
> if (delay <= HZ)
> schedule_timeout_interruptible(delay);
> -
> - /* there should be no signal, but oh well */
> - if (signal_pending(current)) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "windfarm: thread got sigl !\n");
> - break;
> - }
> }
>
> DBG("wf: thread stopped\n");
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
