On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 19:30 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > plain text document attachment (irq-comment.patch) > kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt > numbers. Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_IGNORE. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at osdl.org> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> > --- mb-wireless.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:06.694526864 +0100 > +++ mb-wireless/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:37.084526864 +0100 > @@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) > > /* > * Every platform is required to implement ppc_md.get_irq. > - * This function will either return an irq number or -1 to > + * This function will either return an irq number or NO_IRQ to > * indicate there are no more pending. > - * The value -2 is for buggy hardware and means that this IRQ > - * has already been handled. -- Tom > + * The value NO_IRQ_IGNORE is for buggy hardware and means that this > + * IRQ has already been handled. -- Tom > */ > irq = ppc_md.get_irq(); > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
