[linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > > So it looks like we need this sequence:
> > > 
> > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */
> > > finish()	/* _WAK */
> > > device_resume()
> > 
> > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19?
> 
> Remind. But note that freezer is not yet SMP safe... Rafael is working
> on that.

Thanks.

On the other hand, I really wonder (and suspect) whether the problem isn't 
really the freezer or even the kernel resume ordering, but simply an ACPI 
internal resume ordering thing.

Doesn't ACPI have per-device "WAK" calls anyway? Shouldn't we just call 
those _individually_ as we walk the device tree (perhaps in the 
"early_resume" stage) rather than calling them all in one chunk?

		Linus


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux