On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:50:25PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote: >> The PowerOP patch has nothing to do with the removal of cpufreq. You >> may be confusing this work with the david signleton patch. > > I am totally confused about who is working on what, and what provides > what. > > Can someone make quick cheat-sheet that shows the different > developers/companies and projects here? The fact that it's impossible > to keep this straight in the first place does not bode well... > > Or, can each of the different projects send a _short_, 1 paragraph, 4 > sentance maximum summary of the different things. Think of it as your > "elevator pitch". The different multi-page summaries ware making my > eyes glaze over... > Sure, I think that is very necessary right now. In fact, everyone should probably hold off on commenting until this is well understood. While I think its good to reset the discussion with a high level summary, a lot of discussion explaining why PowerOP is required for embedded devices has occurred over the last several months that can not be summarized in 4 sentences. People will definitely need to read the archives to catch up on the why. The PowerOP summary will follow soon. > thanks, > > greg k-h >
