Hi! > We have thought about merging the decisions into a single range of > operating points, but the added plumbing to get idle information back to > the policy manager seemed unappealing. > > We don't use cpufreq, so Pavel's arguments about not changing the kernel > interface weren't a concern, for us. We're using a kernel interface that > is all our own (and unappealingly ioctl-based). Well, but you can see that my arguments are quite important for mainline merge? ;-). Of course, powerop/oppoint patches are okay for your own use. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!
